If there's one thing true in business it's that if you create something interesting then someone else is going to try and do something similar. In that way, challengers to the iPhone's pre-release crown have rolled up and been dismissed, from the mundane - dreary skins for your current smartphone - to the delicately interesting - I'm looking at you, Prada phone. There's no doubting that some have had more merit than others, but the lusts of the blogosphere keep coming back to Apple's finest, and if the number of magazines on whose covers the iPhone lurks are anything to go by, the real-world is getting just as obsessed. So tell me, who could put a dent in the iPhone's side?

A company few would bet against would be Google. Analysts and pundits may argue as to whether their "don't be evil" mantra still stands or if it's slipped a little in the face of ever-growing profits, but the underlying truth is that it's a huge resource of talented, intelligent people with expertise in the trafficking of data. And no matter how pretty the interface, at the end of the day that's all a cellphone is: your own little data funnel.
So might the Google phone be real enough to put the willies up Apple? Doing some data gathering of his own is Simeon Simeonov of HighContrast, who has taken all the strands of Google's cellular expertise and tied it up into a convincing argument that not only have they set their sights on mobile applications (such as their partnership with Samsung) but on a fully Google-branded phone experience.
According to Simeon's clandestine source the Google phone will be most definitely smart, a Blackberry-like optimised Java interface running on top of a C++ and Linux blended core. Google already have ex-Danger (sire of the Sidekick series) Andy Rubin heading a department of 100, likely working on just that. Graphics, courtesy of 2005 acquisition Skia who specialised in Flash-lite portable display engines, might be similar to the leaked screenshot Engadget received back in January, and provide a naturalistic and eye-candy rich way to access multiple pre-loaded features that include VOIP.
It's that last part which potentially makes Google's first cellphone most interesting. Network operators have traditionally been afraid of VOIP or any other technology that might eat away at their precious voice call revenue, and you could imagine them being tentative to the point of obstinance when faced with Google demanding IP-based communications handled by their networks. However, if the rumour that the search engine giant will leverage its own marketing potential to minimise the cost-to-carrier and thus build working relationships with multiple networks (the polar opposite of Apple's watertight deal with Cingular) to basically "use their pipes" is true, the golden goose of mobile technology - reasonably priced cellular data - may just come home to roost.
Where once network subsidies were the only way to get the latest handset in your pocket, Google's expertise at targeted advertising could introduce new flexibility to the industry. Freed from the persistent demand to recoup the initial investment in a new subscriber, thanks to realistic ad-returns from well selected and appropriate content, the carrier could instead concentrate on expanding coverage and adding tailored value:
"We know if we improve quality, revenue follows" Eric Schmidt, Chief Executive, Google
That's got to be better for consumer and carrier alike. So far it's all rumour and suggestion, but I think it's a pretty fair presumption that should Google decide to step into the cellphone business it has the potential to cause more upset than even Apple's iPhone did.






















prada came out much earlier then iphone did.
the Prada phone is just that – a phone. It’s beautiful in every respect. However, it does lack a lot of key features like storage, wifi/3G (not to mention it’s only a tri-band phone). Lacks a qwerty keyboard (virtual or real). Battery life is only so-so. So the Prada phone is not a realistic comparison to the iPhone.
Yes, Google is all powerful and Google search is perfect – simple/clean but when you try and look at the the add-ons from Froogle to translations to apps, it’s all just a jumble. Look at when you navigate from the front search page to MORE – it’s just a jumble – something Apple is rarely accused of. Google’s UI beyond the search is all over the board.
So, yes, they will get some things right but a Google phone might as well be a Linux phone – it will have some powerful customized features and that will appeal to some but most people do not want to have to download code to get something to work.
Is the Prada phone even color? The Prada phone is also like $200-$300 MORE than the iphone. It’s life span is pretty 2 months – after June, you might as well be wearing last year’s shoes.
I doubt there’s much to a Google phone, at least in competition to the iPhone.
Since Dr. Eric Schmidt, Google’s CEO, sits on Apple’s board, it would seem to be a major conflict of interest for Google to be releasing a knock-off w/o Apple’s permission.
There’s also Dr. Schmidt’s recent mention that they’re “doing more and more things together” which would imply Google’s doing some cool stuff for the iPhone, not against it.
Interesting view on the break-even method. This has been tried by having advertisement incrporated in calls, but wasn’t well targeted enough. Do you think caller behaviour will be handed over to Google in order to let them make it profitable to the carriers? It could mean a serious change to the business models. Not content is king, but knowing what us little people wish for.
how bother when you’ll go for emergency call and hv to listen their ads and then you know that next end line is engaged.