<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only in California</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/only-in-california-161635.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/only-in-california-161635.php</link>
	<description>tracking the iPhone revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: doug</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/only-in-california-161635.php/comment-page-1#comment-10900</link>
		<dc:creator>doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 17:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/only-in-california-161635.php#comment-10900</guid>
		<description>For me, the real question is not whether the toxins in any one iPhone will harm any one iPhone owner. It is probably true that iPhone users won&#039;t come into contact with these chemicals while they are using their phones. But, given current practice around technology products, in 10, 15, or 20 years, a good number of the over a million iPhones Apple has sold will likely end up in a landfill somewhere, and at that point all of the nasty stuff inside becomes an issue, even if there are only small amounts in each phone. That&#039;s why &lt;a href=&quot;http://iphonememe.com/2007/10/16/green-iphone-in-2008/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;I was pretty bummed&lt;/a&gt; by the recent Greenpeace report. I think Apple makes the best consumer electronics products on the market and leads the field in terms of design, user-interface, and functionality. Greenpeace probably targets Apple in part because they are in this leadership role, hoping Apple will also take the lead in green technology design as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me, the real question is not whether the toxins in any one iPhone will harm any one iPhone owner. It is probably true that iPhone users won&#8217;t come into contact with these chemicals while they are using their phones. But, given current practice around technology products, in 10, 15, or 20 years, a good number of the over a million iPhones Apple has sold will likely end up in a landfill somewhere, and at that point all of the nasty stuff inside becomes an issue, even if there are only small amounts in each phone. That&#8217;s why <a href="http://iphonememe.com/2007/10/16/green-iphone-in-2008/" rel="nofollow">I was pretty bummed</a> by the recent Greenpeace report. I think Apple makes the best consumer electronics products on the market and leads the field in terms of design, user-interface, and functionality. Greenpeace probably targets Apple in part because they are in this leadership role, hoping Apple will also take the lead in green technology design as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.186 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 01:10:37 -->

