Most iPhone users have had their share of ire and angst with AT&T over poor service at one time or another. The NYT is now blaming the iPhone for the woes on the AT&T network. The story is even more suspect when you find that the main source of the info is a paid AT&T consultant.
Apple has filed a counter suit against Nokia after Nokia filed suit against Apple over patent licensing fees. Apple alleges that Nokia is trying to overcharge on patent fees because it "missed the boat" and chose to "copy the iPhone."
The Guardian has announced the launch of its official iPhone app. The app lets you download content to listen too later and allows personalization along with access to picture galleries and more. The app isn’t free though and costs $3.99 here in the US.
If NYT is the New York Times, could that be spelled out. If so, what makes their (or anybody’s) opinion important?
Is there a link to this article?
Is anybody editing this stuff?
And last, the software that make auto links to key words has run amok with your blog… words like “copy” are linked (i.e. “Nokia copy the iPhone”) and it links to a printer ad!
Brain-dead piece.
DF
I read the New York Times article and it is BS… I definitely disagree with this article. mostly because I live in Poland and have absolutely ZERO problems with reception or data speeds. I am not an Apple Fan…If I lived in the states I would still be using my Windows Smart phone. What I would like to see is All US carriers be able to have the iphone and then tell me how well networks are doing.