<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steve&#8217;s keynote address at Macworld 2007 &#8211; Unveiling the iPhone!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php</link>
	<description>tracking the iPhone revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-104</guid>
		<description>Keep in mind that this WAS NOT my prediction but a tip that came into myiphone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep in mind that this WAS NOT my prediction but a tip that came into myiphone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 23:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-99</guid>
		<description>Do you all feel stupid yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you all feel stupid yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blash</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-95</link>
		<dc:creator>blash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 22:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-95</guid>
		<description>HAHA!!!!!!

totally fuzzing wrong. OMG. the iPhone is gonna rule.

Whoever your source is, (s)he&#039;s going down. Way down.

www.apple.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAHA!!!!!!</p>
<p>totally fuzzing wrong. OMG. the iPhone is gonna rule.</p>
<p>Whoever your source is, (s)he&#8217;s going down. Way down.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.apple.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.apple.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deepkid</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>deepkid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2006 05:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-47</guid>
		<description>some of you need to use os x&#039;s dictionary to distinguish between rumor and fact. the above wasn&#039;t supplied through an offical apple press release nor an official spokesperson. get a grip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some of you need to use os x&#8217;s dictionary to distinguish between rumor and fact. the above wasn&#8217;t supplied through an offical apple press release nor an official spokesperson. get a grip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 23:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-43</guid>
		<description>THIS IS A TERRIBLE THING... if you are a mac fan you would not post such damaging things to a blog... ie:... a phone not being released etc... this is a horrible thing to do... if my stock goes down i am totally going after you!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS IS A TERRIBLE THING&#8230; if you are a mac fan you would not post such damaging things to a blog&#8230; ie:&#8230; a phone not being released etc&#8230; this is a horrible thing to do&#8230; if my stock goes down i am totally going after you!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:42:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-42</guid>
		<description>the mobile me didn&#039;t get slap down.  apple owns the mark which was approved in hong kong - thru 2015.  don&#039;t have link but will post later.

the hong kong filing date was 2005 which superceded the US filing date.

as far as don&#039;t mess with a good thing, there was nothing wrong with the powerbook - why change or fix it?  look at the macbook and macbook pro sporting intel...one helluva machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the mobile me didn&#8217;t get slap down.  apple owns the mark which was approved in hong kong &#8211; thru 2015.  don&#8217;t have link but will post later.</p>
<p>the hong kong filing date was 2005 which superceded the US filing date.</p>
<p>as far as don&#8217;t mess with a good thing, there was nothing wrong with the powerbook &#8211; why change or fix it?  look at the macbook and macbook pro sporting intel&#8230;one helluva machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:26:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-41</guid>
		<description>Fun but not believable. I doubt that the content of the keynote is settled till the day before the keynote. There have been stories that Steve has even dropped things the day of the keynote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun but not believable. I doubt that the content of the keynote is settled till the day before the keynote. There have been stories that Steve has even dropped things the day of the keynote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Required</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-40</link>
		<dc:creator>Required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 21:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-40</guid>
		<description>Except the Mobile Me trademark got slapped down.

Let me tell you: you don&#039;t MESS with what&#039;s not broken. Apple&#039;s learned this lesson the hard way. Steve&#039;s not stupid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except the Mobile Me trademark got slapped down.</p>
<p>Let me tell you: you don&#8217;t MESS with what&#8217;s not broken. Apple&#8217;s learned this lesson the hard way. Steve&#8217;s not stupid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Rubin</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Rubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 19:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-39</guid>
		<description>What makes me suspect this is a fake is the iPod announcement. Apple almost always makes iPod announcements at separate media events. Ever since the first Windows-compatible iPod, and especially since they separated the product line out to its own division, Apple has consistently shied away from tying the iPod line directly to the Mac line. Part of this is not announcing new iPods at MacWorld. Which means iPhone would be out of place at MacWorld as well. Oh yeah, and 10.5 by March? I doubt it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes me suspect this is a fake is the iPod announcement. Apple almost always makes iPod announcements at separate media events. Ever since the first Windows-compatible iPod, and especially since they separated the product line out to its own division, Apple has consistently shied away from tying the iPod line directly to the Mac line. Part of this is not announcing new iPods at MacWorld. Which means iPhone would be out of place at MacWorld as well. Oh yeah, and 10.5 by March? I doubt it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 19:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Apple did away with the &quot;Power&quot; part of PowerBook at the last Macworld Expo.  Perhaps Steve will do the same with &quot;i&quot; Pod and go with something completely new like &quot;Mobile Me&quot; - which they own the trademark.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple did away with the &#8220;Power&#8221; part of PowerBook at the last Macworld Expo.  Perhaps Steve will do the same with &#8220;i&#8221; Pod and go with something completely new like &#8220;Mobile Me&#8221; &#8211; which they own the trademark.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Required</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>Required</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Anyone expecting a) an &#039;iPhone&#039; and b) Apple to abandon the iconic iPod touch wheel is an idiot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone expecting a) an &#8216;iPhone&#8217; and b) Apple to abandon the iconic iPod touch wheel is an idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David H Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-33</link>
		<dc:creator>David H Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 16:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-33</guid>
		<description>I find several things very difficult to believe about this description.

First, I don&#039;t think there has ever been a keynote without new Macs being announced. The consumer Macs seem pretty up to date at the moment but I think the Mac Pro is about ready for a quad-core dual processor announcement.  Apple&#039;s competitors already have such a machine, and I don&#039;t think Apple would want to be left behind on that front.

First and a half.  To announce new displays - which only the professional types are interested in - would be almost unprecedented without new Macs to go with them.

Second.  I don&#039;t think Apple can cost-effectively make a 17&quot; Cinema Display, nor do I think they would want to.  They would have to sell it for about $300-400 in today&#039;s market and I don&#039;t think there&#039;s any profit in that for them. A 17&quot; iMac, which has a stronger processor, would be cheaper than a less powerful Mac Mini + a 17&quot; Apple display.  I don&#039;t see Apple as going that route.

Third, while a black cherry theme might be attractive there is something about it that doesn&#039;t feel Mac-like.  There might be more colors added but I think Aqua as the default theme is here to stay.

Finally, they would not use the code name of ITV.  They would use the launch name, whatever it is.  This alone makes me feel that we&#039;re not looking at a real list of talking points, because an authentic list would have the code names removed and the description of Leopard more fleshed out.  I think this was made by someone who knows no more about what will actually happen than I do.

Hope that was interesting.

D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find several things very difficult to believe about this description.</p>
<p>First, I don&#8217;t think there has ever been a keynote without new Macs being announced. The consumer Macs seem pretty up to date at the moment but I think the Mac Pro is about ready for a quad-core dual processor announcement.  Apple&#8217;s competitors already have such a machine, and I don&#8217;t think Apple would want to be left behind on that front.</p>
<p>First and a half.  To announce new displays &#8211; which only the professional types are interested in &#8211; would be almost unprecedented without new Macs to go with them.</p>
<p>Second.  I don&#8217;t think Apple can cost-effectively make a 17&#8243; Cinema Display, nor do I think they would want to.  They would have to sell it for about $300-400 in today&#8217;s market and I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s any profit in that for them. A 17&#8243; iMac, which has a stronger processor, would be cheaper than a less powerful Mac Mini + a 17&#8243; Apple display.  I don&#8217;t see Apple as going that route.</p>
<p>Third, while a black cherry theme might be attractive there is something about it that doesn&#8217;t feel Mac-like.  There might be more colors added but I think Aqua as the default theme is here to stay.</p>
<p>Finally, they would not use the code name of ITV.  They would use the launch name, whatever it is.  This alone makes me feel that we&#8217;re not looking at a real list of talking points, because an authentic list would have the code names removed and the description of Leopard more fleshed out.  I think this was made by someone who knows no more about what will actually happen than I do.</p>
<p>Hope that was interesting.</p>
<p>D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-32</guid>
		<description>At Macworld Steve usually announces iLife upgrade. There is no mention of iLife in the list, so I do not think it is real :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At Macworld Steve usually announces iLife upgrade. There is no mention of iLife in the list, so I do not think it is real :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 15:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Well it looks like I&#039;ll be getting a Sony Walkman Phone then. My current contract is up but  I&#039;ll wait until right after the Keynote. Too bad, I&#039;ll also be selling my iPod Nano as I won&#039;t be needing it anymore.  The Sony Walkman phone even has a FM radio. This is a Bummer Apple!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it looks like I&#8217;ll be getting a Sony Walkman Phone then. My current contract is up but  I&#8217;ll wait until right after the Keynote. Too bad, I&#8217;ll also be selling my iPod Nano as I won&#8217;t be needing it anymore.  The Sony Walkman phone even has a FM radio. This is a Bummer Apple!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not Possible</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php/comment-page-1#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Not Possible</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Dec 2006 07:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amobileme.com/no-mentioning-of-iphone-in-steves-keynote-address-26143.php#comment-29</guid>
		<description>This is possibly a diversion...per Jason D. O&#039;Grady...here&#039;s O&#039;Grady&#039;s thoughts on the iPhone via &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://www.macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/apple_using_iphone_as_diversion/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;MacDailyNews.com&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;There have been reports around the Web that Apple&#039;s much-rumored iPhone has been delayed and/or that it&#039;ll be a flop,&quot; Jason D. O&#039;Grady blogs for ZDNet. &quot;Then it occurred to me - could iPhone be a diversion?&quot;

&quot;Apple engages in a fair amount of misinformation in the lead up to Macworld Expo San Francisco too. They&#039;ve been known to selectively leak plausible-sounding stories to various rumor sites around the Web to throw us off the scent. Sometimes there are so many different Macworld Expo rumors that it&#039;s virtually impossible to tell the credible from the decoys,&quot; O&#039;Grady writes. &quot;What if iPhone is just a decoy?&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Full article &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href=&quot;http://blogs.zdnet.com/Apple/?p=350&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is possibly a diversion&#8230;per Jason D. O&#8217;Grady&#8230;here&#8217;s O&#8217;Grady&#8217;s thoughts on the iPhone via <a target="_blank" href="http://www.macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/apple_using_iphone_as_diversion/" rel="nofollow">MacDailyNews.com</a></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;There have been reports around the Web that Apple&#8217;s much-rumored iPhone has been delayed and/or that it&#8217;ll be a flop,&#8221; Jason D. O&#8217;Grady blogs for ZDNet. &#8220;Then it occurred to me &#8211; could iPhone be a diversion?&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Apple engages in a fair amount of misinformation in the lead up to Macworld Expo San Francisco too. They&#8217;ve been known to selectively leak plausible-sounding stories to various rumor sites around the Web to throw us off the scent. Sometimes there are so many different Macworld Expo rumors that it&#8217;s virtually impossible to tell the credible from the decoys,&#8221; O&#8217;Grady writes. &#8220;What if iPhone is just a decoy?&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Full article <a target="_blank" href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Apple/?p=350" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.226 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 04:30:08 -->

