<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New spicy hot iPhone details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php</link>
	<description>tracking the iPhone revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cleverboy</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4357</link>
		<dc:creator>Cleverboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2007 03:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4357</guid>
		<description>Read the USA Today article.
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/gear/2007-06-22-touch-screen-phones_N.htm
&quot;Press hard&quot; is woefully out of line.  While its arguable it was just misperception on this &quot;secret source&#039;s&quot; part, I highly doubt it. LAME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the USA Today article.<br />
<a href="http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/gear/2007-06-22-touch-screen-phones_N.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.usatoday.com/tech/products/gear/2007-06-22-touch-screen-phones_N.htm</a><br />
&#8220;Press hard&#8221; is woefully out of line.  While its arguable it was just misperception on this &#8220;secret source&#8217;s&#8221; part, I highly doubt it. LAME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4305</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 08:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4305</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[quote comment=&quot;4290&quot;]I don&#039;t know this sounds fishy to me. The iPhone uses a Capacitive touch screen. Touching the screen &quot;hard&quot; should make no difference. Theoretically, you could probably even just skim your finger across the surfaceand it should register the same. With capacitive touch screen proximity to another capacitive object is the key factor, not pressure.  The HTC uses a resistive touch screen. This kind of touch screen has a metalic conductive material on the surface of the screen. Pushing on the screen causes resistance in the conductive material, and pushing down harder does make a difference. Most windows mobile devices use resistance touch screens because WM makes use of a stylus which is typically not possible with a capacitive touch screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anyway.. sounds fishy, and considering the source I wouldn&#039;t put much stock in it.[/quote]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You make a great point!  How do I know?  Well, the LG Prada phone also uses a capacitive screen.  My memory serves me right (actual hands on at CeBIT) the screen was fairly sensitive.  Even though the iPhone&#039;s screen derives from Fingerworks and LG Prada from Synaptics, they are pretty much the same technology.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Refer to this article for more details....&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myitablet.com/onyx-concept-phone-gives-birth-to-twins-iphone-and-lg-ke850-17234.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Onyx Concept Phone gives birth to twins: iPhone and LG KE850&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="4290"]I don&#8217;t know this sounds fishy to me. The iPhone uses a Capacitive touch screen. Touching the screen &#8220;hard&#8221; should make no difference. Theoretically, you could probably even just skim your finger across the surfaceand it should register the same. With capacitive touch screen proximity to another capacitive object is the key factor, not pressure.  The HTC uses a resistive touch screen. This kind of touch screen has a metalic conductive material on the surface of the screen. Pushing on the screen causes resistance in the conductive material, and pushing down harder does make a difference. Most windows mobile devices use resistance touch screens because WM makes use of a stylus which is typically not possible with a capacitive touch screen.</p>
<p>Anyway.. sounds fishy, and considering the source I wouldn&#8217;t put much stock in it.[/quote]</p>
<p>You make a great point!  How do I know?  Well, the LG Prada phone also uses a capacitive screen.  My memory serves me right (actual hands on at CeBIT) the screen was fairly sensitive.  Even though the iPhone&#8217;s screen derives from Fingerworks and LG Prada from Synaptics, they are pretty much the same technology.</p>
<p>Refer to this article for more details&#8230;.<a href="http://www.myitablet.com/onyx-concept-phone-gives-birth-to-twins-iphone-and-lg-ke850-17234.php" rel="nofollow">Onyx Concept Phone gives birth to twins: iPhone and LG KE850</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iphonestory</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4298</link>
		<dc:creator>iphonestory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 06:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4298</guid>
		<description>The only thing to make is to wait for the 29 june and to test it by themselves: -)
iphonestory</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing to make is to wait for the 29 june and to test it by themselves: -)<br />
iphonestory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bohoo</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4295</link>
		<dc:creator>Bohoo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 05:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4295</guid>
		<description>What a piece of trash and waste of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a piece of trash and waste of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jbella</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4290</link>
		<dc:creator>jbella</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 04:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4290</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know this sounds fishy to me. The iPhone uses a Capacitive touch screen. Touching the screen &quot;hard&quot; should make no difference. Theoretically, you could probably even just skim your finger across the surfaceand it should register the same. With capacitive touch screen proximity to another capacitive object is the key factor, not pressure.  The HTC uses a resistive touch screen. This kind of touch screen has a metalic conductive material on the surface of the screen. Pushing on the screen causes resistance in the conductive material, and pushing down harder does make a difference. Most windows mobile devices use resistance touch screens because WM makes use of a stylus which is typically not possible with a capacitive touch screen. 

Anyway.. sounds fishy, and considering the source I wouldn&#039;t put much stock in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know this sounds fishy to me. The iPhone uses a Capacitive touch screen. Touching the screen &#8220;hard&#8221; should make no difference. Theoretically, you could probably even just skim your finger across the surfaceand it should register the same. With capacitive touch screen proximity to another capacitive object is the key factor, not pressure.  The HTC uses a resistive touch screen. This kind of touch screen has a metalic conductive material on the surface of the screen. Pushing on the screen causes resistance in the conductive material, and pushing down harder does make a difference. Most windows mobile devices use resistance touch screens because WM makes use of a stylus which is typically not possible with a capacitive touch screen. </p>
<p>Anyway.. sounds fishy, and considering the source I wouldn&#8217;t put much stock in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4285</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 03:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4285</guid>
		<description>There’s an open letter addressed to Ryan Block over at InvestorVillage that Dan just sent to me. It’s an interesting read so I’ll post the letter here…thanks Dan!



&lt;blockquote&gt;   Hi Ryan,

         I consider the publication of material from unnamed sources to be very unfair. In the little blurb in your article you claim many things about the keyboard of the iPhone. Have you ever been able to touch an iPhone or use it for an extended period? Apple appears willing to give some credible journalists access to an iPhone for the purpose of a substantive review. Have you requested to do a review for Apple? That would be a much more useful thing to do for the community than simply publishing something some guy told you. How do we know that this person was being honest with you? Perhaps that person wants to affect the price of the stock so that they can make a quick profit. How do we know that you aren&#039;t trying to manipulate things? You do now have a reputation for publishing false information that can significantly affect the short term price of a stock. You must feel the need to be very careful about what you say. Has the SEC contacted you about any of this? I&#039;d be interested to see if they are concerned about credible journalists publishing false or otherwise unconfirmed rumors with the possible intent of manipulating prices. 

   Can you give us any information about the source of your information? Was the source of this keyboard information the same as the source of the internal Apple email you received a few weeks ago? If so, are you at least a little less trusting of this source now or do you simply believe everything he or she says? Was it a completely different source? Are you at least absolutely certain this person had access to an iPhone and had no axe to grind with Apple or their employees? 

   You describe the keyboard as &quot;disappointing&quot;. How so? Would you prefer it had no keyboard at all? It&#039;s a nice thing to have the ability to input short amounts of text, don&#039;t you think?  Can&#039;t you see that there could be uses for this? I and everyone else knows that there will be limits to the amount of typing that one will want to do on an iPhone. I also would not type anything significant on a BlackBerry keyboard. What&#039;s the point? 

You say it won&#039;t replace a BlackBerry. It&#039;s not a business product. Now, I guess this is because of the keyboard. But have you considered what people in business do? Do you believe they need to be constantly typing long documents while they are on sales calls or something? Perhaps you&#039;re thinking about what a journalist needs. I&#039;d agree that a journalist needs to be able to type moderately long documents but don&#039;t you have a desk to work at? Perhaps when you&#039;re out on the road hunting down secret sources you could have them email you the text of the information they are leaking so that you can just cut and paste into your article saving you the difficulty of typing these things. As a byproduct of this you&#039;ll have a little more time to actually try and find a second or third source for your information.  You do at least have a second source, don&#039;t you? If not, you might try John Dvorak. I&#039;m sure he could confirm some of this stuff for you.  

   Good luck to you in whatever career you choose to take on ;) &lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=445&amp;mn=65805&amp;pt=msg&amp;mid=2417888&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Re: Some fun facts about Ryan Block&lt;/a&gt; [Via InvestorVillage]


</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s an open letter addressed to Ryan Block over at InvestorVillage that Dan just sent to me. It’s an interesting read so I’ll post the letter here…thanks Dan!</p>
<blockquote><p>   Hi Ryan,</p>
<p>         I consider the publication of material from unnamed sources to be very unfair. In the little blurb in your article you claim many things about the keyboard of the iPhone. Have you ever been able to touch an iPhone or use it for an extended period? Apple appears willing to give some credible journalists access to an iPhone for the purpose of a substantive review. Have you requested to do a review for Apple? That would be a much more useful thing to do for the community than simply publishing something some guy told you. How do we know that this person was being honest with you? Perhaps that person wants to affect the price of the stock so that they can make a quick profit. How do we know that you aren&#8217;t trying to manipulate things? You do now have a reputation for publishing false information that can significantly affect the short term price of a stock. You must feel the need to be very careful about what you say. Has the SEC contacted you about any of this? I&#8217;d be interested to see if they are concerned about credible journalists publishing false or otherwise unconfirmed rumors with the possible intent of manipulating prices. </p>
<p>   Can you give us any information about the source of your information? Was the source of this keyboard information the same as the source of the internal Apple email you received a few weeks ago? If so, are you at least a little less trusting of this source now or do you simply believe everything he or she says? Was it a completely different source? Are you at least absolutely certain this person had access to an iPhone and had no axe to grind with Apple or their employees? </p>
<p>   You describe the keyboard as &#8220;disappointing&#8221;. How so? Would you prefer it had no keyboard at all? It&#8217;s a nice thing to have the ability to input short amounts of text, don&#8217;t you think?  Can&#8217;t you see that there could be uses for this? I and everyone else knows that there will be limits to the amount of typing that one will want to do on an iPhone. I also would not type anything significant on a BlackBerry keyboard. What&#8217;s the point? </p>
<p>You say it won&#8217;t replace a BlackBerry. It&#8217;s not a business product. Now, I guess this is because of the keyboard. But have you considered what people in business do? Do you believe they need to be constantly typing long documents while they are on sales calls or something? Perhaps you&#8217;re thinking about what a journalist needs. I&#8217;d agree that a journalist needs to be able to type moderately long documents but don&#8217;t you have a desk to work at? Perhaps when you&#8217;re out on the road hunting down secret sources you could have them email you the text of the information they are leaking so that you can just cut and paste into your article saving you the difficulty of typing these things. As a byproduct of this you&#8217;ll have a little more time to actually try and find a second or third source for your information.  You do at least have a second source, don&#8217;t you? If not, you might try John Dvorak. I&#8217;m sure he could confirm some of this stuff for you.  </p>
<p>   Good luck to you in whatever career you choose to take on ;) </p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.investorvillage.com/smbd.asp?mb=445&#038;mn=65805&#038;pt=msg&#038;mid=2417888" rel="nofollow">Re: Some fun facts about Ryan Block</a> [Via InvestorVillage]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4284</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 03:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4284</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;4281&quot;]some of those criticisms might be right, but i don&#039;t believe one second that we will have to &quot;press&quot; the screen, that just does not make sense, and all demos have shown that this does not appear to be the case.[/quote]

Well, actually if the iPhone&#039;s glass touch screen is anything like the HTC Touch, then you do!  Unfortunately for the Touch, you DO need to press firmly on the screen in order to get a response.  Lets hope that&#039;s not the case with the iPhone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="4281"]some of those criticisms might be right, but i don&#8217;t believe one second that we will have to &#8220;press&#8221; the screen, that just does not make sense, and all demos have shown that this does not appear to be the case.[/quote]</p>
<p>Well, actually if the iPhone&#8217;s glass touch screen is anything like the HTC Touch, then you do!  Unfortunately for the Touch, you DO need to press firmly on the screen in order to get a response.  Lets hope that&#8217;s not the case with the iPhone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swissarmy</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4283</link>
		<dc:creator>swissarmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 03:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4283</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for the rumor stuff, but this is complete BS...ya, i&#039;m real sure engadget got one of the 200 iPhone testers (sworn to secrecy and all that) to &quot;talk&quot; to them to tell them how bad the phone&#039;s keyboard and internet is.  This is far different than the leaks apple sometimes has for a new OS or whatever, where details of a build get out...this is a tester coming out to say how bad the phone is...this just smacks of being fake and meant to rile people up.

That being said, the iphone&#039;s keyboard might actually suck, but engadget didnt talk to a tester to confirm so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for the rumor stuff, but this is complete BS&#8230;ya, i&#8217;m real sure engadget got one of the 200 iPhone testers (sworn to secrecy and all that) to &#8220;talk&#8221; to them to tell them how bad the phone&#8217;s keyboard and internet is.  This is far different than the leaks apple sometimes has for a new OS or whatever, where details of a build get out&#8230;this is a tester coming out to say how bad the phone is&#8230;this just smacks of being fake and meant to rile people up.</p>
<p>That being said, the iphone&#8217;s keyboard might actually suck, but engadget didnt talk to a tester to confirm so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4281</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 02:42:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4281</guid>
		<description>some of those criticisms might be right, but i don&#039;t believe one second that we will have to &quot;press&quot; the screen, that just does not make sense, and all demos have shown that this does not appear to be the case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>some of those criticisms might be right, but i don&#8217;t believe one second that we will have to &#8220;press&#8221; the screen, that just does not make sense, and all demos have shown that this does not appear to be the case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4280</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 02:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4280</guid>
		<description>I agree...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4276</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 01:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4276</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;4274&quot;]this is so much bullshit
ever since the iphone was announced everybody has been in aww at the amazing new features and simplistic approach to the user interface
on the flip side everybody who knows the price tag is out of their range or cingular is just not an option desides to look for a few trivial flaws
for example, the keyboard, if one person out of the 200 said they were having trouble with the keyboard they engadget jumps all over it and sayis it sucks
i will be getting an iphone
you all are suckers
enjoy your plastic screened cheap phones[/quote]

Shouldn&#039;t take it personal - not to defend Engadget, these are not &quot;their&quot; words but the words of 1-tester.

I don&#039;t care what anyone says, I&#039;m getting one and so will the staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="4274"]this is so much bullshit<br />
ever since the iphone was announced everybody has been in aww at the amazing new features and simplistic approach to the user interface<br />
on the flip side everybody who knows the price tag is out of their range or cingular is just not an option desides to look for a few trivial flaws<br />
for example, the keyboard, if one person out of the 200 said they were having trouble with the keyboard they engadget jumps all over it and sayis it sucks<br />
i will be getting an iphone<br />
you all are suckers<br />
enjoy your plastic screened cheap phones[/quote]</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t take it personal &#8211; not to defend Engadget, these are not &#8220;their&#8221; words but the words of 1-tester.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t care what anyone says, I&#8217;m getting one and so will the staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4274</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 00:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4274</guid>
		<description>this is so much bullshit
ever since the iphone was announced everybody has been in aww at the amazing new features and simplistic approach to the user interface
on the flip side everybody who knows the price tag is out of their range or cingular is just not an option desides to look for a few trivial flaws
for example, the keyboard, if one person out of the 200 said they were having trouble with the keyboard they engadget jumps all over it and sayis it sucks
i will be getting an iphone
you all are suckers 
enjoy your plastic screened cheap phones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is so much bullshit<br />
ever since the iphone was announced everybody has been in aww at the amazing new features and simplistic approach to the user interface<br />
on the flip side everybody who knows the price tag is out of their range or cingular is just not an option desides to look for a few trivial flaws<br />
for example, the keyboard, if one person out of the 200 said they were having trouble with the keyboard they engadget jumps all over it and sayis it sucks<br />
i will be getting an iphone<br />
you all are suckers<br />
enjoy your plastic screened cheap phones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4273</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 00:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4273</guid>
		<description>I think blasting Engadget makes no sense; they&#039;re reporting what they know at the time. Do they make mistakes, yes; but from my experience they always admit when they&#039;ve misreported or jumped the gun on a story.

That said, none of what is stated here is new. You would expect the smudges (all regular iPod&#039;s have this issue and why you would purchase a case to limit this type of damage) and poor performance over Edge as that story has been reported on for quite a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think blasting Engadget makes no sense; they&#8217;re reporting what they know at the time. Do they make mistakes, yes; but from my experience they always admit when they&#8217;ve misreported or jumped the gun on a story.</p>
<p>That said, none of what is stated here is new. You would expect the smudges (all regular iPod&#8217;s have this issue and why you would purchase a case to limit this type of damage) and poor performance over Edge as that story has been reported on for quite a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vincent Nguyen</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4272</link>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2007 00:30:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4272</guid>
		<description>[quote comment=&quot;4268&quot;]Oh this is totally true because you know Engadget is 100% correct on everything. Some people are just idiots.[/quote]

Well, I&#039;m not saying Engadget is 100% accurate all the time, every time.  But they do get more scoops most sites don&#039;t get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[quote comment="4268"]Oh this is totally true because you know Engadget is 100% correct on everything. Some people are just idiots.[/quote]</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m not saying Engadget is 100% accurate all the time, every time.  But they do get more scoops most sites don&#8217;t get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jules</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php/comment-page-1#comment-4268</link>
		<dc:creator>Jules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2007 23:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/new-spicy-hot-iphone-details-23922.php#comment-4268</guid>
		<description>Oh this is totally true because you know Engadget is 100% correct on everything. Some people are just idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh this is totally true because you know Engadget is 100% correct on everything. Some people are just idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.246 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 01:42:04 -->

