<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>iPhone Buzz &#187; iTunes Store</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/category/itunes-store/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com</link>
	<description>tracking the iPhone revolution</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:36:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Logitech offers new iPhone headsets, iTunes account security issue, kinks getting worked out for Verizon iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/logitech-offers-new-iphone-headsets-itunes-account-security-issue-kinks-getting-worked-out-for-verizon-iphone-249241.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/logitech-offers-new-iphone-headsets-itunes-account-security-issue-kinks-getting-worked-out-for-verizon-iphone-249241.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 12:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[earphones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphonebuzz.com/?p=9241</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Logitech has unveiled a couple new Ultimate Ears headsets that will work with the iPhone for making and receiving calls. The headsets are the Ultimate Ears 500vi and 200vi with a mic and inline volume controls costing $79.99 and $39.99 respectively. If your iTunes account is linked to your PayPal account, you had better check [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Logitech has unveiled a couple new <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/logitech-outs-new-ultimate-ears-500-350-200-500vi-and-200vi-headsets-2498703/">Ultimate Ears headsets</a> that will work with the iPhone for making and receiving calls. The headsets are the Ultimate Ears 500vi and 200vi with a mic and inline volume controls costing $79.99 and $39.99 respectively.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ue500-sg.jpg"><img src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/ue500-sg.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="307" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9242" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-9241"></span></p>
<p>If your iTunes account is linked to your PayPal account, you had better check things out today. A bunch of accounts all around the country linked to PayPal have been <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/itunes-accounts-linked-to-paypal-suffering-from-security-hole-2398587/">hacked</a> with as much as thousands of dollars in charges made.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/verizon-and-apple-still-ironing-out-iphone-deal-2398581/">new rumor</a> has surfaced again focusing on the long rumored Verizon iPhone. This rumor says that the kinks are still being worked out for the largest network around to get the iPhone and that the main thing is trying to decide if 2011 or 2012 is the goal for launch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/logitech-offers-new-iphone-headsets-itunes-account-security-issue-kinks-getting-worked-out-for-verizon-iphone-249241.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iTunes book scam, Evo versus iPhone 4, iPhone 4 reception issues a non-issue</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-book-scam-evo-versus-iphone-4-iphone-4-reception-issues-a-non-issue-059139.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-book-scam-evo-versus-iphone-4-iphone-4-reception-issues-a-non-issue-059139.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 12:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shane McGlaun</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphonebuzz.com/?p=9139</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[iPhone users will want to check their accounts after a scam surfaced where accounts on iTunes were hacked and bogus charges were made for books. Some users report $1400 in charges for bogus books. Sister site SlashGear has a column where the case for the EVO 4G versus iPhone 4 is made. If you are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>iPhone users will want to check their accounts after a scam surfaced where accounts on iTunes were hacked and <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/itunes-scam-drives-dodgy-app-store-sales-0592752/">bogus charges</a> were made for books. Some users report $1400 in charges for bogus books.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/top_books_itunes_hacked-485x500.jpg"><img src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/top_books_itunes_hacked-485x500.jpg" alt="" width="485" height="500" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-9140" /></a></p>
<p><span id="more-9139"></span></p>
<p>Sister site SlashGear has a column where the case for the <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/making-the-case-for-evo-vs-iphone-0392720/">EVO 4G versus iPhone 4</a> is made. If you are trying to decide between the new iPhone 4 and the Evo 4G this story is worth a read.</p>
<p>Apple announced late last week that the widely reported issues with the iPhone 4 and its reception were due in part to a bad formula. Apple says the reason the iPhone 4 shows less bars when held is due in part to a formula that <a href="http://www.slashgear.com/iphone-4s-reception-issue-could-be-a-non-issue-0292710/">shows more bars</a> than the iPhone 4 really has.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-book-scam-evo-versus-iphone-4-iphone-4-reception-issues-a-non-issue-059139.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Appsto.re, iPhone app URL shortener</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/appsto-re-iphone-app-url-shortener-267977.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/appsto-re-iphone-app-url-shortener-267977.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 04:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Budi Putra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes app store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[URL shortener]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphonebuzz.com/?p=7977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite many other URL shortening services out there, here is another new service on this field: appsto.re. It focuses specifically on iTunes links. Why use appsto.re URL&#8217;s? According to them: They contain the name of your app, making people more likely to click. They take people straight to iTunes, increasing the chance people will buy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite many other URL shortening services out there, here is another new service on this field: <a href="http://appsto.re/">appsto.re</a>. It focuses specifically on iTunes links.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-7976" src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/appstore-screen-580x340.png" alt="appstore-screen" width="580" height="340" /><span id="more-7977"></span>Why use appsto.re URL&#8217;s? <a href="http://appsto.re/">According to them</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li>They contain the name of your app, making people more likely to click.</li>
<li>They take people straight to iTunes, increasing the chance people will buy your app.</li>
<li>They are short! So they are easy to share on twitter or where ever.</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>However, a <em>TechCrunch</em> reader tells us that iPhone apps already have short URLs, e.g. http://itunes.com/apps/scavenge.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/07/26/appstore-because-iphone-apps-apparently-needed-a-custom-url-shortener/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/appsto-re-iphone-app-url-shortener-267977.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone to get direct TV and movie downloads?</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/iphone-to-get-direct-tv-and-movie-downloads-237395.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/iphone-to-get-direct-tv-and-movie-downloads-237395.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 10:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Budi Putra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple iPhone Rumor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple iPhone Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rumor]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphonebuzz.com/?p=7395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apple will begin to allow downloads of movies and TV shows through the iPhone, according to the hottest rumor &#8211;complete with supposed screenshots&#8211; revealed just before a week-end. The blogger wrote: This revelation, (again at least to me) comes by way of an advertisement in the new ad supported version of the app Twitterfon released [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apple will begin to allow downloads of movies and TV shows through the iPhone, according to the hottest rumor &#8211;complete with supposed screenshots&#8211; revealed just before a week-end.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7396" src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/itunes_tv1.jpg" alt="itunes_tv1" width="320" height="480" /><span id="more-7395"></span>The blogger wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>This revelation, (again at least to me) comes by way of an advertisement in the new ad supported version of the app Twitterfon released on 5/15/09. Three ads, stumbled upon by a geeky friend of mine who wishes to remain anonymous for fear of the powerful arms of the Apple legal department, scrolling across the top of the app were for ‘iTunes Movies’, ‘iTunes TV’ and ‘iTunes Movie Rentals’.</p></blockquote>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-7397" src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/itunes_tv2.jpg" alt="itunes_tv2" width="320" height="480" /></p>
<p>Unsubstantiated rumor? I don&#8217;t know, though on-device downloads would be nice. Currently, the only way to get video on an iPhone is by downloading it via iTunes on your computer and syncing with your device.</p>
<p>[via <a href="http://open.salon.com/blog/kwamejones/2009/05/22/iphone_to_get_itunes_tv_and_movies">Open Salon</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/iphone-to-get-direct-tv-and-movie-downloads-237395.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple looking at over the air downloads for 3G iPhone</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/apple-looking-at-over-the-air-downloads-for-3g-iphone-202585.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/apple-looking-at-over-the-air-downloads-for-3g-iphone-202585.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 14:10:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ashoperon</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WWDC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphonebuzz.com/?p=2585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many 3G devices on many carriers can download music and such over the air, but for EDGE devices like the iPhone this is a little less practical. Now there are over the air downloads via the iTunes Store for the iPhone, but you must be in a WiFi hot spot to take advantage of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many 3G devices on many carriers can download music and such over the air, but for EDGE devices like the iPhone this is a little less practical. Now there are over the air downloads via the iTunes Store for the iPhone, but you must be in a WiFi hot spot to take advantage of the service. With the addition of 3G to the new iPhone though, over the air downloads will be much more feasible.</p>
<p style="center;" align="center"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-2587 aligncenter" src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/05/itunes-logo1.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="200" /></p>
<p><span id="more-2585"></span></p>
<p>That&#8217;s because the addition of 3G will make the device exponentially faster when transferring data. Also, 3G will increase call quality. An article in the New York Time suggests that Apple is in talks with major record labels about the service. It seems all is not well in the negotiations though, as the labels are all wanting more than 70 cents per song.</p>
<p>According to the article Apple is planning a big launch in June. Apple also is looking to add more songs to its listing of ring tones. Apple is also looking to bring call tones to the iPhone, which may be worth even more than a traditional ring tone according to the report. It is assumed if a deal is struck it will be introduced at Apple&#8217;s WWDC event on June 9th.</p>
<p>[Via <a href="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/08/05/19/apple_wants_over_the_air_music_downloads_for_3g_iphone.html">AppleInsider</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/apple-looking-at-over-the-air-downloads-for-3g-iphone-202585.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC exec criticises iTunes pricing, anti-piracy security</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/nbc-exec-criticises-itunes-pricing-anti-piracy-security-182238.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/nbc-exec-criticises-itunes-pricing-anti-piracy-security-182238.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 07:43:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphonebuzz.com/?p=2238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When NBC started making conciliatory gestures toward Apple back in January it looked as thought the network&#8217;s TV shows might soon be back on iTunes.  Of course, that hasn&#8217;t happened, and the two companies are still arguing over how media is priced and whether Apple is using, as many analysts suspect, iTunes as a loss-leader to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When NBC started making <a href="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/nbc-suggest-apple-itunes-reunion-might-be-coming-soon-211935.php" target="_blank">conciliatory gestures</a> toward Apple back in January it looked as thought the network&#8217;s TV shows might soon be back on iTunes.  Of course, that hasn&#8217;t happened, and the two companies are still arguing over how media is priced and whether Apple is using, as many analysts suspect, iTunes as a loss-leader to pull in new iPod buyers.  Now NBC&#8217;s chief digital officer, George Kliavkoff, has cranked the pressure up a notch, with the suggestion that current anti-piracy solutions <a href="http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9920399-7.html" target="_blank">aren&#8217;t secure enough</a> to protect his company&#8217;s content.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2239" title="nbc_itunes" src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/nbc_itunes.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="161" /></p>
<p><span id="more-2238"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If you look at studies about MP3 players, especially leading MP3 players and what portion of that content is pirated, and think about how that content gets onto that device, it has to go through a gatekeeping piece of software, which would be a convenient place to put some antipiracy measures.  One of the big issues for NBC is piracy. We are financially harmed every day by piracy. It results in us not being able to invest as much money in the next generation of film and TV products&#8221; George Kliavkoff, chief digital officer, NBC</p></blockquote>
<p>While NBC Universal&#8217;s film arm distributes through iTunes, currently the only legal way for users to view TV content online is via the Hulu service.  Described as a YouTube for professionally produced video &#8211; together with the anti-piracy measures such producers demand &#8211; Hulu currently lacks any download or mobile device use.  Since iTunes is the largest music retailer in the US, Kliavkoff&#8217;s comments seem obviously aimed at Apple.</p>
<p>NBC and Apple have disagreed over the way wholesale and retail pricing is arrived at.  NBC are looking to set their own wholesale price, from which point they say retailers are free to mark it up, to make profit, or mark it down and use it as a loss-leader.  However Apple are apparently trying to set both the price they sell content at and the price they buy it, passing the loss-leader mark-down on to NBC.  The network pulled its TV shows from iTunes in December last year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/nbc-exec-criticises-itunes-pricing-anti-piracy-security-182238.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Contact search and meeting invite available on iPhone OS 2.0 5A240d build</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/contact-search-and-meeting-invite-available-on-iphone-os-20-5a240d-build-092155.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/contact-search-and-meeting-invite-available-on-iphone-os-20-5a240d-build-092155.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vincent Nguyen</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3G iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[App Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone SDK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphonebuzz.com/contact-search-and-meeting-invite-available-on-iphone-os-20-5a240d-build-092155.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new build of iPhone OS 2.0 now features contact search.  Alleluia!  I have over 1,500 contacts I’ve been collecting over the past ten years.  After flicking through the list a few dozen times does get old.  Anyways, the search function is also included with the revised iPhone Simulator that comes with the SDK build [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new build of iPhone OS 2.0 now features contact search.  Alleluia!  I have over 1,500 contacts I’ve been collecting over the past ten years.  After flicking through the list a few dozen times does get old.  Anyways, the search function is also included with the revised iPhone Simulator that comes with the SDK build 9M2158a, beta 3.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/iphonecontactsearching.jpg" alt="iphone contact search" /></p>
<p><span id="more-2155"></span><br />
<a href="http://www.engadgetmobile.com/2008/04/09/iphone-contacts-search-and-meeting-invite-revealed/" target="_blank">Engadget Mobile</a> also reported seeing the contact search in the enterprise version of the firmware 2.0.  They’ve discovered that the little drawer button which did nothing in the “regular old” firmware” is actually a meeting invitation folder, which displays the number of requests just like the SMS and mail icons.  The AppStore and iTune store icons seem to be missing from the Enterprise firmware.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/iphoneent01.jpg" alt="iphone contact meeting invitation" /></p>
<p>Anyone else find anything new related to the iPhone OS 2.0 5A240d build?  Click comment and share with the community.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/contact-search-and-meeting-invite-available-on-iphone-os-20-5a240d-build-092155.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iTunes films supplied at higher resolution than iPhone should support</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-films-supplied-at-higher-resolution-than-iphone-should-support-082143.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-films-supplied-at-higher-resolution-than-iphone-should-support-082143.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2008 09:18:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[iPhone archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-films-supplied-at-higher-resolution-than-iphone-should-support-082143.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After reading about the iPhone for a while, memorising facts from its spec-sheet is just an occupational hazard.  So, Apple&#8217;s cellphone has a maximum screen resolution of 640 x 480 for compatible content&#8230; doesn&#8217;t it?  Ars Technica say no, and they&#8217;ve been playing with video that encoded at 720 x 576, 25fps on both the iPhone and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After reading about the iPhone for a while, memorising facts from its spec-sheet is just an occupational hazard.  So, Apple&#8217;s cellphone has a maximum screen resolution of 640 x 480 for compatible content&#8230; doesn&#8217;t it?  <a target="_blank" href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2008/04/07/iphone-ipod-touch-support-720x576-rather-than-640x480-video">Ars Technica</a> say no, and they&#8217;ve been playing with video that encoded at 720 x 576, 25fps on both the iPhone and the iPod Touch, a figure that&#8217;s funnily enough exactly the same as a PAL DVD.  Videos encoded at that resolution can be viewed both through mobile Safari and funneled over from iTunes, although of course it only shows up at the 480 x 320 resolution of either device&#8217;s screen.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/iphone_movie.jpg" alt="iPhone movie playback" /></p>
<p>So why is this important, if you can&#8217;t see the difference?  As Ars Technica explain, it&#8217;s all about optimising your video library for playback on multiple devices:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;[It] can be [useful] if you want the same files to be playable the mobile device and on the computer screen or TV. If you are interested in experimenting yourself, don&#8217;t forget to stick to baseline H.264 encoding and remember that these files will not play on older generation iPods&#8221;</em>Iljitsch van Beijnum, Ars Technica</p></blockquote>
<p>The upside is that movies bought from the iTunes store are actually being delivered in higher resolution than you might expect, given Apple&#8217;s quoted compatibility for the iPhone; Iljitsch found his copy of <em>Punch-Drunk Love</em> came in at 853 x 366, which would look far better through, say, an Apple TV than a 640 x 480 version might.</p>
<p>[via <a target="_blank" href="http://gizmodo.com/377089/iphone-and-ipod-touch-actually-support-720x576-video-resolution">Gizmodo</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-films-supplied-at-higher-resolution-than-iphone-should-support-082143.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone SDK gives iTunes-rivals the cold shoulder</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/iphone-sdk-gives-itunes-rivals-the-cold-shoulder-192074.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/iphone-sdk-gives-itunes-rivals-the-cold-shoulder-192074.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 21:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone archive]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple iPhone Rumors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone 3rd Party Apps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone SDK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sdk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iphonebuzz.com/iphone-sdk-gives-itunes-rivals-the-cold-shoulder-192074.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back when Steve Jobs announced the iPhone SDK, he told excited developers that the only applications Apple wouldn&#8217;t be permitting through the AppStore were those illegal or pornographic.  Now that some of the dust has settled &#8211; and those 100,000+ coders sitting down in front of the SDK! &#8211; questions are being asked about just [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back when Steve Jobs announced the iPhone SDK, he told excited developers that the only applications Apple wouldn&#8217;t be permitting through the AppStore were those <a target="_blank" href="http://www.phonemag.com/apple-store-for-iphone-apps-sdk-requires-99-developer-membership-031547.php">illegal or pornographic</a>.  Now that some of the dust has settled &#8211; and those 100,000+ coders sitting down in front of the SDK! &#8211; questions are <a target="_blank" href="http://www.javno.com/en/bestseller/clanak.php?id=132356">being asked</a> about just how accurate that statement was.  While it&#8217;s open-season for mobile entertainment software such as games, productive apps or messenger clients, developers behind services such as Rhapsody or Napster, who would rival Apple&#8217;s own iTunes store, are curious to know Steve Jobs stance on them creating programs for the iPhone.</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;It&#8217;s an open question at this point how amenable Apple will be to offering products or applications that could conceivably interfere with its own iTunes revenue stream.  The real interesting test case will be Amazon.  Here&#8217;s a music vendor selling songs that are clearly compatible with the iPhone. Unlike with Rhapsody or Napster, there&#8217;s no DRM you need to make work&#8221;</em> Ross Rubin, analyst, NPD Group</p></blockquote>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/iphone_sdk_not_music_friendly.jpg" alt="iPhone SDK not music friendly" /></p>
<p><span id="more-2074"></span></p>
<p>Meanwhile, the possibilities for music streaming services such as Pandora or Last.fm are also unclear.  <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/streaming-music-to-your-iphone-161205.php">SeeqPod</a>, which advertises itself as a &#8220;playable search&#8221; client, has been offering an iPhone-formatted version of their streaming music service since shortly after the handset first became available, but there is no word on whether they&#8217;ll be allowed to develop a standalone app rather than rely on users navigating to them in Safari. </p>
<p>Apple&#8217;s own SDK guidelines seem purposefully to stand in the way of rival music software.  The well-popularised &#8220;<a target="_blank" href="http://www.phonemag.com/apple-kill-third-party-background-processes-on-iphone-031571.php">no background processes</a>&#8221; clause would render an iPhone (or iPod Touch) running non-iTunes music apps useless, since the playback would not be allowed to continue while other functionality was used.  In fact, the guidelines for third-party software would seem to suggest that no music app could satisfy Apple&#8217;s demands for a seamless user experience:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;It&#8217;s important to make sure that users do not experience any negative effects because of this reality. In other words, users should not feel that leaving your iPhone application and returning to it later is any more difficult than switching among applications on a computer&#8221;</em> Apple SDK documentation</p></blockquote>
<p>Since plugins for Safari or iTunes are similarly out of bounds, that limits functionality-increasing additions such as Last.fm&#8217;s music suggestion widget.</p>
<p>Apple has so far <a target="_blank" href="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/apple-rejected-massive-numbers-of-iphone-sdk-applicants-14122.php">limited developer sign-ups</a>, ostensibly because of the sheer number of interested parties, but it would be interesting to hear how many of those accepted into the iPhone Developers Programme are considering coding potential rivals to the company&#8217;s music download business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/iphone-sdk-gives-itunes-rivals-the-cold-shoulder-192074.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apple Russia caught up in PR nightmare</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/apple-russia-caught-up-in-pr-nightmare-281944.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/apple-russia-caught-up-in-pr-nightmare-281944.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bizarre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MacBook]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/apple-russia-caught-up-in-pr-nightmare-281944.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a turn of events that almost seems too bizarre to be true, Russian journalist and 14-year Mac user Alex Patsay has written an open letter to Apple PR following what sounds to be a disastrous launch event in Moscow.  According to Patsay, Apple has added a 75-percent markup on iPods in Russia &#8211; taking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img align="right" width="225" src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/gallery/files/2/Apple-Event-Sept-5-iPod-Touch-30.jpg" alt="iPod Touch" height="127" style="width: 225px; height: 127px" title="iPod Touch" />In a turn of events that almost seems too bizarre to be true, Russian journalist and 14-year Mac user Alex Patsay has written <a target="_blank" href="http://alexmak.net/blog/2008/01/25/apples-pr-fiasco-in-russia/">an open letter</a> to Apple PR following what sounds to be a disastrous launch event in Moscow.  According to Patsay, Apple has added a 75-percent markup on iPods in Russia &#8211; taking a 16GB iPod Touch to the equivalent of $710 &#8211; and priced the MacBook Air above even inflated European prices: $5,000 for the SSD version.</p>
<p>More worrying, Apple is apparently contravening Russian law by failing to offer the MacBook Air with Cyrillic lettering on the keyboard, nor a Russian-localised iPod Touch.</p>
<p><span id="more-1944"></span></p>
<blockquote><p><em>&#8220;The whole press conference by itself seems to be pretty much useless, because it went about the movie rentals, Apple TV update, iPod touch update, etc &#8211; all great stuff, but with one little problem. iTunes Store doesn&#8217;t exist in Russia, and Apple doesn’t have plans to bring one here. And it makes all these news completely obsolete and useless&#8221;</em> Alex Patsay, alexmac.net</p></blockquote>
<p>Most bizarrely, when one journalist asked an Apple rep how he could pay to update his iPod Touch to the latest 1.1.3 firmware, since Russia lacks the iTunes Store, he was told &#8220;buy a new iPod touch with 1.1.3 firmware - it will have these applications already installed&#8221;</p>
<p>Patsay seems, if anything, concerned for Apple and their success in Russia &#8211; his worry is that buyers will travel to bordering Finland and buy cheaper Apple hardware there to bring back, thus causing Apple Russia to miss out on profits.  But if the whole debacle is even partly true, then I can&#8217;t help but think that Apple might deserve to fall flat on its face.</p>
<p>[via <a target="_blank" href="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/01/28/apple-makes-stuff">The Inquirer</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/apple-russia-caught-up-in-pr-nightmare-281944.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC suggest Apple iTunes reunion might be coming soon</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/nbc-suggest-apple-itunes-reunion-might-be-coming-soon-211935.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/nbc-suggest-apple-itunes-reunion-might-be-coming-soon-211935.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:11:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/nbc-suggest-apple-itunes-reunion-might-be-coming-soon-211935.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having yanked their content from iTunes after arguing with Apple over the prices charged for video &#8211; and accusing the company of slashing the cost of shows such as The Office and Scrubs so as to promote iPod sales &#8211; NBC are now apparently close to making up.  In a Financial Times report about network CEO Jeff Zucker, the NBC head-honcho suggests working relationships [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having <a target="_blank" href="http://www.myitablet.com/nbc-pulls-shows-from-itunes-following-contract-breakdown-031814.php">yanked their content</a> from iTunes after arguing with Apple over the prices charged for video &#8211; and accusing the company of slashing the cost of shows such as The Office and Scrubs so as to promote iPod sales &#8211; NBC are now apparently close to making up.  In a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/877c999c-c784-11dc-a0b4-0000779fd2ac.html?nclick_check=1"><em>Financial Times </em>report</a> about network CEO Jeff Zucker, the NBC head-honcho suggests working relationships are beginning to be patched up:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>Mr Zucker appears to have patched up relations with Apple after a pricing dispute last year led NBC to pull its shows from the iTunes digital media store. &#8220;We’ve said all along that we admire Apple, that we want to be in business with Apple,&#8221; he said. &#8220;We’re great fans of Steve Jobs.&#8221; Financial Times</em></p></blockquote>
<p> <img align="middle" width="300" src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/gallery/files/5/2/5/300x250_GenericNBC.jpg" alt="NBC" height="250" style="width: 300px; height: 250px" title="NBC" /></p>
<p><span id="more-1935"></span></p>
<p>The suspicion is now that NBC used the disagreement in part as a negotiating tactic, attempting to pressure Apple into relinquishing control of media prices into their own hands.  Steve Jobs&#8217; recent announcement of partnerships with the major movie studios, however, may have suggested to NBC that the company was not as dependent on their TV downloads as assumed; while NBC&#8217;s content did make up 1,500hrs of media and it was Apple&#8217;s largest digital video partner, movie downloads and rentals have been received with far greater excitement.</p>
<p>[via <a target="_blank" href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/21/wow-that-was-fast-nbc-looking-to-patch-things-up-with-apple/">TechCrunch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/nbc-suggest-apple-itunes-reunion-might-be-coming-soon-211935.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iTunes rumored to get $3.99 movie rentals</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-rumored-to-get-399-movie-rentals-091900.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-rumored-to-get-399-movie-rentals-091900.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2008 22:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Analyst]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Macworld Expo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/itunes-rumored-to-get-399-movie-rentals-091900.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All signs are pointing to an announcement of iTunes movie rentals at Tuesday&#8217;s Macworld Expo; that&#8217;s the conclusion drawn after a Bloomberg report quoted &#8220;people familiar&#8221; with Apple&#8217;s upcoming addition to the media download service.  Newcomers Warner Bros. and Fox will join existing studio partners Paramount, Walt Disney Co. and Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. in making [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All signs are pointing to an announcement of iTunes movie rentals at Tuesday&#8217;s Macworld Expo; that&#8217;s the conclusion drawn after a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=asfuyhaPNAGc">Bloomberg report</a> quoted &#8220;people familiar&#8221; with Apple&#8217;s upcoming addition to the media download service.  Newcomers Warner Bros. and Fox will join existing studio partners Paramount, Walt Disney Co. and Lions Gate Entertainment Corp. in making their films available for temporary download, priced at $3.99 for 24hrs.</p>
<p> <img align="middle" width="450" src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/gallery/files/5/2/2/iTunes.JPG" alt="iTunes to get movie rental upgrade" height="232" style="width: 450px; height: 232px" title="iTunes to get movie rental upgrade" /></p>
<p><span id="more-1900"></span></p>
<p>Both new and vintage titles will apparently be available, and analysts believe the upgrade will be used to springboard higher sales of the Apple TV set-top box.  In fact, some predict an upgrade to that device too; Bear Stearns &amp; Co. analyst Andrew Neff suggested that the Cupertino-based firm would announce the next-gen software version for the unit, which streams media from networked Macs to display on a connected TV.</p>
<p>The news comes as Apple has been pressured into <a target="_blank" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7178651.stm">reducing the price of UK iTunes music downloads</a>, to ensure parity with European prices.</p>
<p>[via <a target="_blank" href="http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/09/itunes-movie-rentals-to-include-warner-bros/">Engadget</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-rumored-to-get-399-movie-rentals-091900.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NBC pulls shows from iTunes following contract breakdown</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/nbc-pulls-shows-from-itunes-following-contract-breakdown-031814.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/nbc-pulls-shows-from-itunes-following-contract-breakdown-031814.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 19:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/nbc-pulls-shows-from-itunes-following-contract-breakdown-031814.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Following their decision not to renew their contract with Apple over disagreements regarding iTunes pricing, NBC removed all of its content &#8211; including that of its affiliates &#8211; from the online store over the weekend.  Citing Apple&#8217;s refusal to consider even &#8220;modest&#8221; demands, and suggesting that the company was slashing prices on video in order [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Following their <a target="_blank" href="http://www.myitablet.com/rumor-nbc-and-apple-may-be-parting-ways-311458.php">decision not to renew their contract</a> with Apple over disagreements regarding iTunes pricing, <a target="_blank" href="http://apple20.blogs.fortune.cnn.com/2007/12/03/nbc-pulls-its-tv-shows-from-apple-itunes/">NBC removed</a> all of its content &#8211; including that of its affiliates &#8211; from the online store over the weekend.  Citing Apple&#8217;s refusal to consider even &#8220;modest&#8221; demands, and suggesting that the company was slashing prices on video in order to increase iPod sales, NBC&#8217;s withdrawal means Apple has lost its largest partner for digital video and an estimated 1,500 hours of media.  That includes popular shows such as The Office, Scrubs and 30 Rock.</p>
<p> <img align="middle" width="300" src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/gallery/files/5/2/5/300x250_GenericNBC.jpg" alt="NBC &amp; Apple partnership is no more" height="250" style="width: 300px; height: 250px" title="NBC &amp; Apple partnership is no more" /></p>
<p><span id="more-1814"></span></p>
<p>Instead, content from <span>Bravo, mun2, NBC, NBC News, CNBC, NBC Sports, Sci Fi, Sleuth, Telemundo or USA Network are available on NBC&#8217;s own ad-supported download service, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.nbc.com/Video/">NBC Direct</a>, which currently lacks a Mac-version of the software (one is expected next year).</span></p>
<p><span>[via <a target="_blank" href="http://ilounge.com/index.php/news/comments/nbc-pulls-tv-shows-from-itunes-store/">iLounge</a>]</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/nbc-pulls-shows-from-itunes-following-contract-breakdown-031814.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Another dumb lawsuit against Apple</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/another-dumb-lawsuit-against-apple-081718.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/another-dumb-lawsuit-against-apple-081718.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>James Allan Brady</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPod Touch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/another-dumb-lawsuit-against-apple-081718.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So Frederick Black has formed another lawsuit against Apple. This one is regarding the notion that Apple has illegally tied the iPod to iTunes. Sure, you have to use iTunes to get your music onto your iPod/iPhone, but this case isn’t about that. This case is about the music being sold at the iTunes store [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Frederick Black has formed another lawsuit against Apple. This one is regarding the notion that Apple has illegally tied the iPod to iTunes. Sure, you have to use iTunes to get your music onto your iPod/iPhone, but this case isn’t about that.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/gallery/files/5/2/5/gavelpod.jpg" alt="gavel iPod court lawsuit" /></p>
<p>This case is about the music being sold at the iTunes store being tied to the iPod and about how music from other online stores can’t be put on the iPod, which is incorrect. So Mr. Black, do your research, there are now several places where you can buy DRM-free tracks that you can put on any MP3 player, including iTunes, and the best part, they now no longer charge extra for DRM-free tracks from the iTunes store.</p>
<p><span id="more-1718"></span></p>
<p>So, good luck in your future endeavors Mr. Black, but I am sure Apple covered their ass a little better than you might think, in fact I’d be willing to wager that if you are suing due to music purchased prior to iTunes selling DRM-Free tracks that Apples nice little iTunes Plus upgrade service should take care of that. And there is probably some fine print protecting Apple even if you should choose not to use that tool.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/gadgets/2007/11/apple-hit-with-.html" target="_blank">Apple Hit with Yet Another Lawsuit: iPods Illegally Tied to iTunes</a> [via wired]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/another-dumb-lawsuit-against-apple-081718.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iTunes DRM-free &#8216;Plus&#8217; tracks reduced to $0.99</title>
		<link>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-drm-free-plus-tracks-reduced-to-099-161641.php</link>
		<comments>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-drm-free-plus-tracks-reduced-to-099-161641.php#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 22:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Davies</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iTunes Store]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.myitablet.com/itunes-drm-free-plus-tracks-reduced-to-099-161641.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The eagle-eyed music lovers over at Ars Technica spotted some interesting fluctuations in iTunes pricing earlier this week, with some DRM-free &#8220;Plus&#8221; tracks being reduced to the same $0.99 as encrypted songs.  Now, Apple has officially announced that all iTunes Plus tracks will be priced this same amount, making good on Steve Jobs&#8217; pledge to do what [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The eagle-eyed music lovers over at Ars Technica spotted some <a target="_blank" href="http://arstechnica.com/journals/apple.ars/2007/10/15/itunes-plus-drm-free-tracks-expanding-dropping-to-99-¢">interesting fluctuations</a> in iTunes pricing earlier this week, with some DRM-free &#8220;Plus&#8221; tracks being reduced to the same $0.99 as encrypted songs.  Now, Apple has <a target="_blank" href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119256135983660860.html">officially announced</a> that all iTunes Plus tracks will be priced this same amount, making good on Steve Jobs&#8217; pledge to do what he could to improve access to non-DRM music.</p>
<p> <img align="middle" width="450" src="http://www.iphonebuzz.com/gallery/files/5/2/5/1331967238_bfa27033b3.jpg" alt="iTunes DRM-free tracks now same price as encrypted music" height="253" style="width: 450px; height: 253px" title="iTunes DRM-free tracks now same price as encrypted music" /></p>
<p><span id="more-1641"></span></p>
<p>A current bone of contention that is as of yet unresolved is whether tracks previously bought can be &#8220;upgraded&#8221; to DRM-free, as used to be the case by paying the difference between the two types.  Since this difference has now been removed, and barring any price drop of standard songs, it will remain to be seen whether free upgrades of tracks now available unencrypted for the same price will be permitted.</p>
<p>In an interesting twist, EMI label head Alain Levy used the Apple announcement <a target="_blank" href="http://www.electronista.com/articles/07/10/16/itunes.plus.price.drop/">to disclose</a> that he was in talks with Cupertino regarding bringing in flexible pricing for iTunes tracks, in such a way that popular songs could potentially rise to $1.29 while infrequently downloaded music would fall accordingly.  Apple is yet to comment, although any such plan would be, as Levy recognises, implemented in the course of 12 months rather than immediately.</p>
<p>[via <a target="_blank" href="http://www.apple-touch.com/drm-free-itunes-plus-tracks-reduced-to-099-16102.php">Apple-Touch</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iphonebuzz.com/itunes-drm-free-plus-tracks-reduced-to-099-161641.php/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.298 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2012-02-10 00:47:28 -->

